Introduction 1
An extension would have obstructed at least one side of the building and impacted on the façade hierarchy. The new building appears to float above the old one, and the austere, angular solidity of the existing building contrasts with the dynamic curved surface of the new building, which represents the principle of a single, flowing façade like an organic object.
Introduction 2
An extension would have obstructed at least one side of the building and impacted on the façade hierarchy. The new building appears to float above the old one, and the austere, angular solidity of the existing building contrasts with the dynamic curved surface of the new building, which represents the principle of a single, flowing façade like an organic object. An extension would have obstructed at least one side of the building and impacted on the façade hierarchy. The new building appears to float above the old one, and the austere, angular solidity of the existing building contrasts with the dynamic curved surface of the new building, which represents the principle of a single, flowing façade like an organic object. An extension would have obstructed at least one side of the building and impacted on the façade hierarchy. The new building appears to float above the old one, and the austere, angular solidity of the existing building contrasts with the dynamic curved surface of the new building, which represents the principle of a single, flowing façade like an organic object. An extension would have obstructed at least one side of the building and impacted on the façade hierarchy. The new building appears to float above the old one, and the austere, angular solidity of the existing building contrasts with the dynamic curved surface of the new building, which represents the principle of a single, flowing façade like an organic object.
Introduction 3
An extension would have obstructed at least one side of the building and impacted on the façade hierarchy. The new building appears to float above the old one, and the austere, angular solidity of the existing building contrasts with the dynamic curved surface of the new building, which represents the principle of a single, flowing façade like an organic object. An extension would have obstructed at least one side of the building and impacted on the façade hierarchy. The new building appears to float above the old one, and the austere, angular solidity of the existing building contrasts with the dynamic curved surface of the new building, which represents the principle of a single, flowing façade like an organic object. An extension would have obstructed at least one side of the building and impacted on the façade hierarchy. The new building appears to float above the old one, and the austere, angular solidity of the existing building contrasts with the dynamic curved surface of the new building, which represents the principle of a single, flowing façade like an organic object. An extension would have obstructed at least one side of the building and impacted on the façade hierarchy. The new building appears to float above the old one, and the austere, angular solidity of the existing building contrasts with the dynamic curved surface of the new building, which represents the principle of a single, flowing façade like an organic object.
